by Chris from Washington » Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:05 pm
Yep, he does need to be responsible for what he going to get from the insurance company. If he wasn't paying the extra for protection of the property, then he really can't expect them to just pay it off. If you're going to have a car like that, you need to have at least full coverage.
I had full coverage on the Camaro up until I decided to tear it apart. Once I get it all back together again, I'll put full on it again. Better to be safe then sorry.
I really don't understand the rider part tho. I've never had that before, and when the Camaro got broke into a few years ago, my policy covered anything that was bolted down. All I had was full coverage, didn't pay extra for audio equipment or anything like that. Does it just depend on the insurance company?
Yep, he does need to be responsible for what he going to get from the insurance company. If he wasn't paying the extra for protection of the property, then he really can't expect them to just pay it off. If you're going to have a car like that, you need to have at least full coverage.
I had full coverage on the Camaro up until I decided to tear it apart. Once I get it all back together again, I'll put full on it again. Better to be safe then sorry.
I really don't understand the rider part tho. I've never had that before, and when the Camaro got broke into a few years ago, my policy covered anything that was bolted down. All I had was full coverage, didn't pay extra for audio equipment or anything like that. Does it just depend on the insurance company?