Page 2 of 4

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 6:47 pm
by jonnyb
yea. wattages add up for multiple subwoofers.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:03 pm
by bdyman
so it counts for the speakers too not the subs

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 11:40 pm
by cargodz
If you're amping speakers, then you use the rms wattage of each for each channel (2 channel or 4 channel).

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 6:00 pm
by bdyman
http://www.onlinecarstereo.com/CarAudio ... ctID=16692

so let me guess get right that amp is perfect for my application so i think so and its 100x4 rms is that 100 rms watts per speaker???

Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:45 am
by cargodz
Yes, 100rms x 4 = 100 watts per speaker

Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:36 am
by GlassWolf
the "power handling ratings" on speakers [SEE FAQ SECTION] is nothing but a thermal rating for how much heat (measured in watts) the speaker's coils can handle without physical damage.

This has nothing to do with how much power the speaker needs to reach full output, or excursion.

the power required to drive the speaker is usually considerably less than it's "RMS power handling" spec on the box.

For door speakers and component sets, most times 50-75 watts per channel is all you need from a good, clean amplifier.

Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:07 pm
by cargodz
^ Also a good thing to keep in mind when setting your gains ;)

Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:07 pm
by bdyman
very cool thank`s for your help it looks like i will be going with the crunch amp, it also says it is bridgeable do you think it is a wise idea to bride the speakers?? or just hook it up normally??

Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:58 pm
by cargodz
I'd stick with running the speakers in the normal fashion... allows for balance... bridging better suited for running mid bass ;)

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 11:43 am
by bdyman
oh so kinda like if i was using a component speaker then i could bridge,
so basicly regular speakers hook up normally components i have a choice of bridging