Page 4 of 4
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 2:18 am
by tomcat
The longer I have it and the more I listen to it the more I like it. It does sound great, I was just expecting to much with just 400 watts. I guess I'm just to much of a bass head and it took me awhile to appreciate the SQ side car audio.
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:23 am
by solacedagony
Ryan from Ohio wrote:Geo!
Hes alive!
Nice to see ya.
He's been busy with another forum
If the Focal doesn't offer enough output, you can always add more :)
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:24 pm
by Jonathan
This sub itself is designed along the lines of getting a sealed type of response, with the advantages a ported box has in terms of reducing excursion around tuning, lowering distortion at that point, etc. The subwoofer itself doesn't have a ton of excursion and it's a good compromise for a SQ application.
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:16 am
by cargodz
Like Ryan... Glad to see ya Back Geo
Carry on with the topic
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 6:31 am
by OnYrMrk
I know the specs say that this subwoofer likes a ported box, but I have the same subwoofer and it is in a 1.77cuft SEALED enclosure. granted, the output isn't much ( best is 132db ) but, it does do one thing very well. It is the perfect SQ sub to me. Light, tight, controlled...if a sub could sing, this would be the sub.
The only difference between his and mine is that I have the dual 2ohm 13" subwoofer
welcome back GEO, you were missed bro!