Page 1 of 2
rockford fosgate punches.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 7:36 pm
by k0rnyfr33k
which punches are the best the older ones or the newer models
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 4:04 am
by smoker
imo definitely the older stuff....if you can locate an old set of pro's they definitely kick ass...
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 4:49 am
by k0rnyfr33k
what models would u reccomend???
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 4:55 am
by k0rnyfr33k
ohh sry pros nvm
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 5:03 am
by k0rnyfr33k
the only older models i see are pucnch z series, rf series, and series 1
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 5:36 am
by smoker
forget series 1...you probably wont find any pros anymore.they were made when rf was still just selling to small companies. any you did find would be at least 10 years old. are you looking just for rf subs? you can get a better sub than an rf for less or about the same money...
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 6:55 am
by Ryan from Ohio
Series 1 was garbage.
The subs sucked and blew easily and the amps failed readily...
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 8:25 am
by smoker
i could live with the old old series ones for a budget speaker, they had a whole line of them at one point subs, midbass, mids, tweets and all but the amps really sucked....
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 8:58 am
by Chris from Washington
Yes the series 1 stuff was garbage, I had a couple of series 1 amps back in the early 90's and they were just crap. I swear they were trying to compete with pyramid or something when they built those.
The old Punch amps were good.
The really old school type like the 150 (square with 2 knobs on the end)
even the more recent punch 200 (oval type) weren't bad.
I've never really cared for fosgate speakers.
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 8:59 am
by k0rnyfr33k
so itts a battel between z and rf which ones better