Lucky JeremyC!!!!

Ryan from Ohio · Post by **Ryan from Ohio** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:08 am

Ouch thats a years worth of pay! lol

smoker · Post by **smoker** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:37 am

JeremyC wrote:WOW those are pretty. Damn sure going to look good in my car.
I don't know smoker, you think I need more that 600 watts for my front stage?
Joey what can I say. Your the man. Looks like they will be there just in time.
Lucky bastard. LOL.

you running all 4 on your front stage? dont get me wrong its nice stuff, i just cant see running subs with them....

Bwcad1 · Post by **Bwcad1** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:11 am

i just cant see spending the money on something like that when you wont hear the difference.

JeremyC · Post by **JeremyC** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:42 am

Nah smoker 2 will be running my front stage, with 2 bridged on my subs. So I will be setting around 600 front stage / 1000 subs. Pretty much the same as I have now. My goal in swapping wasn't to get louder, it was to have better SQ, and be running stuff that JC's Customs carries. Its damn near impossiable to sell someone on Genesis and Morel when there setting in a car full of JL and Focal.

Nah Ryan, you would be suprised. We could get you into a set of dual monos for way less than you would expect. Hell order 4 and we can cut you an even better deal.

Oh speaking of Genesis I noticed something on the site the other day.

http://www.genesiscaraudio.net/speakers ... index.html

They sure do look alot like these.

http://www.madisound.com/catalog/produc ... 386824fe1c

I even check the specs, and yes genesis uses scan speak drivers.

Robert Wollenberg · Post by **Robert Wollenberg** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:19 am

I saw that a while back too. But with the quality of the revs, why not rebadge them and try to resell them. I'm sure Genesis is getting a hell of a deal to do that.

joeyc · Post by **joeyc** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:22 pm

Bwcad1 wrote:i just cant see spending the money on something like that when you wont hear the difference.

omg Don't get me started Bill!

Robert Wollenberg · Post by **Robert Wollenberg** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:14 pm

lol, come on you two ... Lets get it on!!! ;-)

Bwcad1 · Post by **Bwcad1** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:02 pm

no reason to get started you know its true. a watt is a watt man.

cargodz · Post by **cargodz** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:10 am

Yeah but it's kinda like comparing a mint classic Ferrari to a new stock Corvette, sure the Corvette has more goodies and power, but sometimes it's all about style, so I think I know what he's after... And yeah, I'd still take the Corvette if you get my meaning in the analogy

Ryan from Ohio · Post by **Ryan from Ohio** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:38 am

Bwcad1 wrote:no reason to get started you know its true. a watt is a watt man.

This has been a hot topic over the last year.

Ive come to realize the truth in the matter. A watt is a watt and if EQ the exact same you will hear no difference between amps. Fact remains that between amps though you would have to EQ them to get them the same, so besides power output that states there is some tonal issues at play.

Thats why nobody can take Richard Clarks money. If it was strictly power to power and all else was left to be, he would be out some money.