Attention all members!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!
Beware of DLS
-
High Society
- Master of My Domain
- Posts: 2473
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:59 am
- Location: Philippines
- Contact:
Beware of DLS
http://www.dls.se/english/index.htm
Looks like there has been some fake copies of DLS. Take a look and see for yourself, so you don't get scamed.
Looks like there has been some fake copies of DLS. Take a look and see for yourself, so you don't get scamed.
♠ Mateo ♠
80 pounds of Titanium
Proud Member of Team Wolfpack Audio
80 pounds of Titanium
Proud Member of Team Wolfpack Audio
-
High Society
- Master of My Domain
- Posts: 2473
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:59 am
- Location: Philippines
- Contact:
-
High Society
- Master of My Domain
- Posts: 2473
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:59 am
- Location: Philippines
- Contact:
Yup
.
DLS drivers were designed by Morel, who licenses from Dynaudio. Dynaudio, in turn, licenses some technology from Scan-Speak along with the technology they developed. Since then DLS branched off and started producing those drivers in Asia.
To add to that, Dynaudio and Scan-Speak were both founded by Ejvind Skaaning. Then Skaaning ditched both and founded ATC (Audio Technology).
They all have similar roots. All of them have lacked development over the years with Skaaning moving on, ATC being the exception since that's where the development efforts are going. I guess you could consider ATC the new king of that hill. The pricing for their drivers are flat out ridiculous for what you get, though. You'll pay $510 EACH for a 6.5" midbass driver from ATC. And that's raw drivers.
DLS drivers were designed by Morel, who licenses from Dynaudio. Dynaudio, in turn, licenses some technology from Scan-Speak along with the technology they developed. Since then DLS branched off and started producing those drivers in Asia.
To add to that, Dynaudio and Scan-Speak were both founded by Ejvind Skaaning. Then Skaaning ditched both and founded ATC (Audio Technology).
They all have similar roots. All of them have lacked development over the years with Skaaning moving on, ATC being the exception since that's where the development efforts are going. I guess you could consider ATC the new king of that hill. The pricing for their drivers are flat out ridiculous for what you get, though. You'll pay $510 EACH for a 6.5" midbass driver from ATC. And that's raw drivers.
-
mikechec9
- Senior Member
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:53 pm
- Location: Chicago/Atlanta
- Contact:
Jonathan wrote:Beware of DLS, which are fake Morels, which are fake Dynaudios
![]()
Funny you should mention it. I understand that these are supposed to be superior to the IR-3, MD-140 and the CDM-54 .Jonathan wrote:Yup.
To add to that, Dynaudio and Scan-Speak were both founded by Ejvind Skaaning. Then Skaaning ditched both and founded ATC (Audio Technology).
They all have similar roots. All of them have lacked development over the years with Skaaning moving on, ATC being the exception since that's where the development efforts are going. I guess you could consider ATC the new king of that hill. The pricing for their drivers are flat out ridiculous for what you get, though. You'll pay $510 EACH for a 6.5" midbass driver from ATC. And that's raw drivers.
http://www.solen.ca/atc.htm
For the price it damn sure better be. But yes, it's the only dome mid I know of that actually has a suspension.
Dome mids are generally horrible performers, but in the car environment the benefits you get from an enclosed mid can typically outweigh the higher distortion numbers. Primarily the fact that a car door will add a ton of energy storage while an enclosed dome is consistent in that regard. This is especially a factor in upper midrange reproduction. Domes also offer better off axis response than cone mids with the benefit of being easier to get good imaging from.
Dome mids are generally horrible performers, but in the car environment the benefits you get from an enclosed mid can typically outweigh the higher distortion numbers. Primarily the fact that a car door will add a ton of energy storage while an enclosed dome is consistent in that regard. This is especially a factor in upper midrange reproduction. Domes also offer better off axis response than cone mids with the benefit of being easier to get good imaging from.