Attention all members!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!

2.3 turbo or 5.0 v8 swap for the ranger.

Anything not related or doesnt fit another Forum.

2.3 Turbo or 5.0 v8?

You may select 1 option

 
 
View results

User avatar
MobileAudio219
Master of My Domain
Posts: 4919
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:00 am
Location: Sullivan Missouri

2.3 turbo or 5.0 v8 swap for the ranger.

Post by MobileAudio219 »

This winter I'll probably tear it apart and build it back to more exicting specs.

Optition One:

Engine:
Stock Mustang Short Block
Stock H.O cam
1.7 Rockers
GT 40 (p) heads
Gt 40 Intake

Transmission:
T5 Transmission


Rear End:
Explorer 8.8", limited slip, rear disc brakes, 3:73 gears.

Or.....

Opition two:
Engine:
Stock 2.3 turbo long block/turbo
15 PSI of boost

Transmission:
Turbo coupe T5

Rearend:
Explorer 8.8", limited Slip, rear disk brakes, 3:55 gears.

Other Mods:
Interior:, New blue carpet, Black/Blue focus SVT leather bucket seats, explorer console, explorer OHC, black leather inserts for the door panels.

Audio:
??????????????

Exterior:
New White Paint, painted front bumper, 4x4 Front Valance, clear turn signals, 2" cowl hood, Grill insert (wire mess), flush tonneau cover, roll pan, tinted stock taillights.

Suspension:
The explorer rearend lowers the back around 4" from stock, So I'll probably lower the front 3" to level it out. Other than that, still figuring out the details.
User avatar
William from NOLA
Posts: 5172
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Metairie, LA
Contact:

Post by William from NOLA »

Put the smallest motor you can possibly put in it. Make it a super gas mileage vehicle.
A.K.A. megahurts4 :: Member since: July 19, 2002 :eek:
User avatar
MobileAudio219
Master of My Domain
Posts: 4919
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:00 am
Location: Sullivan Missouri

Post by MobileAudio219 »

William from NOLA wrote:Put the smallest motor you can possibly put in it. Make it a super gas mileage vehicle.
Either way, it'll probably be a weekend toy, so gas milage isnt a huge concern.

I'm leaning towards the 5.0, god I love the sound of the 5.0.

But it would also to say "Oh, its just a 4 cyl"

Notice the theme though, either way I'll be using ALOT of OEM parts.
ZeroAccess
Senior Member
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 1:58 pm

Post by ZeroAccess »

umm
this is a tough one because I'm a 4cyl person but overall I think the 5.0 will be the better setup just because there are so many out there well hell the 4cyl isn't that rare either...

Shit man I dunno whatever ends up being the cheapest
smoker
Master of My Domain
Posts: 4126
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:00 am
Location: florence, ky
Contact:

Post by smoker »

5 oh
User avatar
MobileAudio219
Master of My Domain
Posts: 4919
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:00 am
Location: Sullivan Missouri

Post by MobileAudio219 »

smoker wrote:5 oh
The 5.0 would probably be cheapest, shoud be able to get the truck into the high 13's N/A, or high 12's with a 125 shot.
Tim
Master of My Domain
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:46 pm
Location: 1060 W. Addison

Post by Tim »

MobileAudio219 wrote:The 5.0 would probably be cheapest, shoud be able to get the truck into the high 13's N/A, or high 12's with a 125 shot.

I like the idea of a turbo, that little psshht is the bomb.

Tim
User avatar
MobileAudio219
Master of My Domain
Posts: 4919
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:00 am
Location: Sullivan Missouri

Post by MobileAudio219 »

The 5.0 would still sound better.
Tim
Master of My Domain
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:46 pm
Location: 1060 W. Addison

Post by Tim »

MobileAudio219 wrote:The 5.0 would still sound better.

True you would get that nice throaty rumble,

Tim
User avatar
MobileAudio219
Master of My Domain
Posts: 4919
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:00 am
Location: Sullivan Missouri

Post by MobileAudio219 »

I dropped an intake off at the machine shop and had to pick it up today, I talked to the owner for about 3-4 hours. He gave me a few real good suggestions about my little side business I have going on...
Post Reply