rockford fosgate punches.

k0rnyfr33k · Post by **k0rnyfr33k** » Fri Sep 02, 2005 7:36 pm

which punches are the best the older ones or the newer models

smoker · Post by **smoker** » Sat Sep 03, 2005 4:04 am

imo definitely the older stuff....if you can locate an old set of pro's they definitely kick ass...

k0rnyfr33k · Post by **k0rnyfr33k** » Sat Sep 03, 2005 4:49 am

what models would u reccomend???

k0rnyfr33k · Post by **k0rnyfr33k** » Sat Sep 03, 2005 4:55 am

ohh sry pros nvm

k0rnyfr33k · Post by **k0rnyfr33k** » Sat Sep 03, 2005 5:03 am

the only older models i see are pucnch z series, rf series, and series 1

smoker · Post by **smoker** » Sat Sep 03, 2005 5:36 am

forget series 1...you probably wont find any pros anymore.they were made when rf was still just selling to small companies. any you did find would be at least 10 years old. are you looking just for rf subs? you can get a better sub than an rf for less or about the same money...

Ryan from Ohio · Post by **Ryan from Ohio** » Sat Sep 03, 2005 6:55 am

Series 1 was garbage.

The subs sucked and blew easily and the amps failed readily...

smoker · Post by **smoker** » Sat Sep 03, 2005 8:25 am

i could live with the old old series ones for a budget speaker, they had a whole line of them at one point subs, midbass, mids, tweets and all but the amps really sucked....

Sat Sep 03, 2005 8:58 am

Yes the series 1 stuff was garbage, I had a couple of series 1 amps back in the early 90's and they were just crap. I swear they were trying to compete with pyramid or something when they built those.

The old Punch amps were good.
The really old school type like the 150 (square with 2 knobs on the end)

even the more recent punch 200 (oval type) weren't bad.

I've never really cared for fosgate speakers.

k0rnyfr33k · Post by **k0rnyfr33k** » Sat Sep 03, 2005 8:59 am

so itts a battel between z and rf which ones better